More Redmond columns, less Wilson

0

Editor,

It is my position the article placements of Mike Redmond and Danielle Wilson be swapped! It’s a matter of principle and purpose. Danielle’s principles, or lack thereof, have been called into question repeatedly. She seems to fancy herself as a smarmy, suburban shock columnist. The purpose of humor columns is to entertain, and Mike does so winsomely. Danielle’s writing was once entertaining – albeit distasteful and rude. It is not entertaining anymore. Her articles are dull. I get it – we readers are constantly reminded how she works full time outside of her home while managing a family with a dolt of a husband. I root for Mike! He’s cheerful, optimistic, self-deprecating in a funny way. And, he doesn’t offend half of Current’s readers!!!

Sara Nist, 46033

Share.

More Redmond columns, less Wilson

0

Editor,

It is my position the article placements of Mike Redmond and Danielle Wilson be swapped! It’s a matter of principle and purpose. Danielle’s principles, or lack thereof, have been called into question repeatedly. She seems to fancy herself as a smarmy, suburban shock columnist. The purpose of humor columns is to entertain, and Mike does so winsomely. Danielle’s writing was once entertaining – albeit distasteful and rude. It is not entertaining anymore. Her articles are dull. I get it – we readers are constantly reminded how she works full time outside of her home while managing a family with a dolt of a husband. I root for Mike! He’s cheerful, optimistic, self-deprecating in a funny way. And, he doesn’t offend half of Current’s readers!!!

Sara Nist, 46033

Share.