Current Publishing

Monon Lake project makes it way to Carmel City Council

citycouncil

By Adam Aasen

A controversial new housing development – which received a negative recommendation from the Carmel Planning Commission – is now being considered by the Carmel City Council.

Representatives from M/I Homes presented their plan for the Monon Lake planned unit development, which would be located north of I-465, near the Monon Trail and Range Line Road.

Organized protestors, from nearby neighborhoods such as College Meadows, Marwood and Orchard Park, filled the council chambers to voice their displeasure. They feel the project creates dangerous traffic concerns, could harm the environment and is too densely plotted for the area. Many city officials have shared their concerns, leading to unanimously negative votes from the entire plan commission and its subdivision committee.

Some city councilors expressed trepidation, but the proposal was sent to the council’s Land Use, Annexation and Economic Development Committee where details can be discussed.

Joshua Kirsh, member of the plan commission and the parks board, spoke against the proposal, saying he feels that this rezone is just a way to cram more homes into a small amount of land. The area is already zoned for 28 homes but M/I Homes is asking to build 43.

“This might be crass for me to say, but this is an obvious attempt to subjugate our zoning laws to accomplish a feat that couldn’t be done any other way,” he said.

Kirsh admitted some of his critics say he overvalues the environmental features of the area. Some have called the lake “slime lake” and feel it’s not a beautiful area, but Kirsh said that’s beside the point. To him, it’s an area worth preserving.

“No amount of beer bottles or cars in the lake suddenly makes this a neighborhood instead of an area for a green space,” he said.

The developer presented its plan, which highlighted an area which they will donate to the parks department to preserve some of the natural environment.

The proposal will be discussed at the council’s Land Use Committee meeting on Aug. 26.

Some Neighbors’ Objections

Developer’s Point of View

Exit mobile version